Who makes the decisions in your life?
In every aspect of social life, you rely on someone else to make decisions for you. Not just in national, regional, and local government, but also in every other community you belong to: schools, unions, professional societies, clubs, condominiums. In all of these communities, you cede your decision-making power to other people and hope they will do the right thing.
| I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.
— Thomas Jefferson, 1816.
Those people don't represent you
As the size of an organization increases, so decreases the incentive to represent you personally. You are granted limited options to choose between, which may not even represent a political view anything near yours. In smaller organizations, you may have a voice, but control is often rooted in an entrenched individual who is not open to input from you or others.
This leads to apathy
When looking at all the different decisions being made for you, and how little control you have over the process, it is difficult to imagine anything that you could do. The common result is that people just give up: we are really busy and have to pick our battles.
Apathy encourages leaders to get away with anything
The more apathetic we get, the more leaders feel free to do whatever they want. In fact, due entirely to the absence of a viable democratic alternative, an apathetic populace is a desirable commodity.
Now there is a way to break the cycle of apathy
In the past few years, the internet has opened up new ways for communities to organize. We have discovered that collective decision-making, if combined with good technology, can result in much better decisions.
Governance can be open and free
This is not your fathers' direct democracy
This is not like a referendum system where everybody votes on one issue, and the majority wins. Collaborative governance is much more nuanced, sophisticated, and solutions-oriented. People work on issues they care about, and if they can build a consensus, then a policy is made.
The potential is limitless
Instead of relying on politicians to make all the important decisions in your life, there is a real and feasible way for you to take control. This is the true promise of democracy; something which could never be achieved in previous eras when people were not able to communicate and coordinate instantaneously around the world. The combination of internet communications and advanced computer software open up the possibility of a world where everyone can participate in governance and where governance is more effective and less prone to failure.
You can make it happen
The basic principles of the Metagovernment project are as listed below.
The following two principles are generally held by every group and person participating in this community.
- Government of, by, and for all the people – Anyone may contribute to any collaborative governance structure.
- Openness in everything – All aspects of governance will be as open as possible, under the principle of radical transparency. All software and systems used to run administrations will be free, open source software and systems.
The following two principles are held by some groups, and are suggested as mechanisms to make collaborative governance more sustainable in the long-term.
- Without consensus, there is no law – Unless consensus can be reached on how a policy could address an issue, then there will be no policy on that issue.
- Consensus through synthesis – When opposing views are presented, preference is always given to synthesis rather than either conflict or compromise.
We anticipate that open governance software will most effectively be used in communities organized around a common theme. Starting with small communities, we will get a better idea of how the process works in the real world and adapt our projects accordingly to enable software to scale to larger and more diverse communities.
Members of those communities will set up an instance of open source governance software and invite members of that community to begin using the software, they will eventually invite the entire community to switch its formal governance mechanism over to the new form. In this way, any community, from a small club to a large government can transition to open source governance.
We do not expect governments, particularly national governments, to cede their authority in the near future, but the expectation of Metagovernment and its associated communities is to gradually make a governance system far superior to the status quo — and so compellingly, unprecedentedly democratic — that the people will simply demand a change to this form of government. In states which claim to be built on democratic principles, the people should be able to peacefully transform their government through the mechanisms of that government or even more gradually through attrition. In less democratic states, the transition may take longer, but open source governments innately are protected from brutal force, as they do not have a single leader or a single physical presence.
The software tools in current development may not be those which gain widespread adoption among the populace, but that's not a reason not to write them. The path transition takes will take us on many unexpected turns, but that's not a reason not to lay the foundations. The philosophies, principles and practices we are developing together form the cornerstone of the next major revision of democratic participation in governance.
|You can make it happen.|